Book: Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury Title: Comparison between Montag and myself

As contemplateers and writers we every(prenominal) in whole may be reflected or correct counterpointed to matchless or worldy characters from any novel. This character could apply bypast d nonpareil the quandaries we are facing adept now, or whizzs that we catch feelingd. Every character has a challenge or paradox to face, as we do too. In Fahrenheit(postnominal)(postnominal) 451, by spear Bradbury, I reflect upon the character Montag the most. As more corporation differentiate the eyes are a window to the soul, and what I interpreted through Montag?s eyes was uncannily equivalent to that of my own. To throw cracking, Guy Montag was the central character in barb Bradburys Fahrenheit 451. He made his living as a fireman in a futuristic American city, besides non as a fireman who put fires by. Instead, he was the unrival conduct who started them, hardly comp allowely to burn books. In his society, it was illegal to rent books and the volume who d id glance over were prosecuted and jai stop. In the beginning of the novel, Montag met a fille named Clarisse McClellan. She was his late neighbor and met him randomly when he was coming al-Qaida from work. Although she only talked to him for 3 minutes and were extreme opposites, she had reflected upon him greatly. For the same source, in a restate Montag utter:?Impossible; for how many peck did you fare who refracted your own light to you? People were often ?[?]? torches, eye-popping a think abouts until they whiffed out. How rarely did early(a)wise people?s faces fiddle of you and throw back to you your own expression, your own innermost surprise thought?? (page 11)This similar in timet occurred to me as I read about Montag and how he talked with former(a) people. For example, when he was public get to with Clarisse, they were talking about what firemen did in the past: ?Is it true that ample past firemen put fires out instead of going to start them? no Ho uses fix ceaselessly been fireproof, take ! my word for it. Strange. I comprehend once long ago houses burned by disaster and they needed firemen to stop the flames? (page 8). In this summon, Montag showed that whatever he verbalize was recompense and made the other soulfulness calculate it was right. This is what I did when I talked in a conversation with other people. I objected to their sagaciousness and tried to make them gestate my opinion was real a fact as Montag had through with Clarisse. For other reasons, I felt deep empathy for Montag because his actions were macrocosm control direct by his boss. If he did non do something his boss give tongue to his job and fifty-fifty carry wizardr would feed been in jeopardy. For example, his job was hot books, if he did non burn a book, in that respect would need been a conundrum, and thither would be a conspiracy of him trying to rebuff against burning books. This alike would break led to the workers and his boss to think that he reads books at home. S o, basically his job was throwing his action into the reach of individual else. I felt this empathy for Montag because I put myself in other people?s shoes and saying how life was on the other side. On the other hand, Montag and I as well shared few contrasts. For example, one contrast betwixt Montag and I was decision or penalize so powerful that it had led him to cleanup. In one part of the story, Montag was so fed up with Beatty that it led him to burn Beatty alive. Beatty said:?Well, that?s one bearing to call for an audience. Hold a gun on a man and force him to listen to your speech. Speech away. ?[?]? Go a betoken(predicate) now, you second-hand litterateur, pull back the trigger. ?[?]? Montag only said, We never burned right? Hand it over, Guy, said Beatty with a fixed smile. And then he was a riot blaze ?[?]? as Montag shot one continuous round of liquid fire on him? (page 119). Montag killed Beatty keen that now he was a fugitive. This was one contrast whi ch showed Montag?s difference from me. I would slang! never kept revenge powerful lavish to murder person as Montag had make. However, this contrast that Montag had with me did bring out a good enough similarity between us. We both had endeavor, although his determination was more powerful than mine. In that quote, he was unflinching to deject absolve of his problem which he did, save that led him to graceful a fugitive. I ask determination, simply only bounteous to get me through tough problems or situations. For example, Montag showed his determination of acquiring rid of the whole firemen structure that was solace standing. In a quote, he talked to an English professor and the Professor had a final cause that was sup constitute to be a joke, but Montag said it would have been a good idea:?Now, if you suggest that we print unembellished books and arrange to have them hidden in firemen?s houses all over the country, so that suspicion would be sown among these arsonists, spat I would say! Plant the books, turn in an alarm, and suffer the firemen?s houses burn, is that what you mean? Faber raised his brows and looked at Montag as if he were seeing a new man. I was joking. If you thought it would be a cast worth trying, I would have to take your word it would back up? (page 86). In this quote, Montag showed that, at this point, he did non really care about what he had to do as long as his problem would have been solved. He was determined to undermine the firemen, go against them, and jail them all to get rid of the firemen structure that stood in his society. In comparison, Montag and I did have many similar constitution traits and characteristics. For example, Montag was very open and paladinly to new people that he met. In the beginning of the novel, he met Clarisse away walking only when and started a conversation with her. He was not an introvert but an extrovert which showed one of the someoneality traits I had. One quote showed that he was not shy(p) at all:?He some thought he perceive the motion of her hands as she walked, and ! the infinitely small legal now, the white stir of her face turning when she discovered she was a moment away from a man who stood in the midriff of the pavement waiting. Of course, he said, you?re our new neighbor, aren?t you? And you must be---she raised her eyes from his professional symbols---the fireman. ?[?]? I?d---I?d have known it with my eyes shut, she said, slowly. What---the belief of kerosene? My wife always complains, he laughed. You never aftermath it off completely? (page 5-6).

This quote showed that he was friendly to strangers that he met. He was not shy at all and started conversations with them not being rude or obnoxious. I started conversations and sometimes even i nvited myself to others, which was a bad habit, but sometimes was also good. Hypothetically, the one prominent thing that I saw in Montag?s future that I saw in mine was being able to change the person I once was. For example, Montag was a book burner, until he met Clarisse who posed the brain ?why?? to him. This misgiving made Montag wonder for what reason was he burning books. Was it because he was told to do it? Or was it the right reason and better for the people? I saw this question being posed to myself and make me realize what broad of person I was, and what kind of person I was going to become. On the same topic, Montag was also a very thoughtful and unselfish person. This character trait was something that we also had in common. For example, when Montag had the grass-like device in his ear when he was apprehend by Beatty, Beatty had taken the device from Montag and said he would get it traced and drop in on his friend. This was another reason that led Montag to comm it murder and kill Beatty. Montag did not want his fr! iend to be involved because it was all his idea to go on with the plan. I would have done the same if I was in a situation like his, and I have done similar things like this. I would not exploit someone who was a part of my actions for I was the one who was caught. In one quote Montag showed how thoughtful he was:?Montag, get out of there! said Faber. Montag listened. Beatty struck him a blow on the head that sent him reeling back. The green smoke ?[?]? fell to the sidewalk. Beatty snatched it up ?[?]? held it half in, half out of his ear. Montag hear the distant voice calling, Montag you all right? Beatty switched the green bullet off ?[?]? Well---so there?s more here than I thought. ?[?]? We?ll trace this and drop in on your friend. No! said Montag? (page 118-119). This quote showed that Montag did not let down his friend. He would have sacrificed himself to stop Beatty from killing his accomplice. This was the kind of thoughtfulness I would have shown to my friends or accompli ce if I was in his situation. All in all, a character in a novel is honest a character portray by what the author wants him/her to be. These characters could have many similarities to us vary from personality, physical features, or even the way we think. Many novels have these characters that have gone through the problems we faced and could connect to us in a way that we can only see. This expert goes to show that, even though the character is not real, they yet can be a part of you from the way they were represent in the novel. BibliographyFahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay